However, it is still necessary to make a strong case for the importance, relevance, and applicability of your research argumentative writing does have a place in scientific papers, but its role is limited you may use persuasive language in the abstract, introduction, literature review, discussion of results, and conclusion, but. Most journal-style scientific papers are subdivided into the following sections: title, authors and affiliation, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion this is accomplished with a general review of the primary research literature ( with citations) but should not include very specific, lengthy explanations that you will. The results section is where you present the results of your research-both narrated for the readers in plain english and accompanied by statistics note: depending on the requirements or the projected length of your paper, sometimes the results are combined with the discussion section organizing results. When editing a manuscript, the section that is typically the most problematic is the discussion the purpose of the discussion is to review the study findings in light of the published literature and draw conclusions from the data in addition, the discussion should be used to support the implications of the authors' findings and. Many researchers are hesitant to do this as they feel it highlights the weaknesses in their research to the editor and reviewer however doing this actually makes a positive impression of your paper as it makes it clear that you have an in depth understanding of your topic and can think objectively of your research discuss.
For instance, you will still want to ensure that your conclusion really does conclude, and does not just go off at a tangent to discuss something that is unrelated to the thesis some people in a dissertation or thesis, there is likely to be a longer section on the limitations of your research important though this. If you remember, a research paper starts with a broad look at the research and narrows down to the results, before the discussion opens it out again at the beginning of the research paper, you looked at all of the previous research and boiled it down into a research question in the discussion, you assess how the results. How to organize the 'discussion and conclusion' section of your research paper for a high-quality academic article, you should divide your 'discussion' section in at least 3 parts, focused on the theoretical contributions of your research paper, the managerial or policy implications, and limitations and future research. Paper masters dicusses how to properly write conclusions and recommendations for research papers the conclusions this section gives you the opportunity to discuss the meaning of your results beyond what they mean statistically that is, you interpret the findings and indicate what can be concluded from them in your.
This video presentation focuses on writing the results, discussion and conclusion chapters of a masters or phd thesis. The second to last step in conducting a research study is to interpret the findings in the discussion section, draw conclusions, and make recommendations for example, almost every single paper written in nigeria that i read recommends that the government should provide more teaching materials and increase the.
Whereas the abstract entices readers to stop and read your article, the discussion and conclusion are the places where readers are likely to pause and a last tip for crafting the language of your discussion section is to review a few recent articles from the journal to which you are submitting your paper. Can someone supply a more descriptive or formal definition there isn't a common definition furthermore, how you're supposed to define formally a humans' texts is this right it depends on a field, country, journal, etc i'll give a more general and brief explanation discussion unrolls the main results,.
I just watched the webinar on structuring a scientific manuscript: perspective of a managing editor, it was very enlightening and helpful, tho i am a little confused with the discussion and conclusion the imrad ends with the discussion but researches summarizes through a conclusion which is which. The conclusion should not repeat information from the discussion section but restate the main conclusions in a new concise way for your readers, so that they are in no doubt what you have achieved while doing the research presented in your paper return to scientific writing from writing a scientific paper 4 · return to. Policy development (government, organisational, institutional), professional practice, academic debate, social or political strategy, research limitations and future research in the same way that the paper opens with a statement of a problem that is of broad concern,. Table of contents what does a dissertation conclusion look like checklist: conclusion what does the discussion look like interpretation of results limitations of your research recommendations for further research checklist: discussion.
Learn how to write up your results, and then discuss them and set them into the context of literature and theory, acknowledging flaws and limitations if you are unsure whether to include certain results, go back to your research questions and decide whether the results are relevant to them it doesn't matter whether they. Chapter 5: discussion and conclusion 51 discussion of research questions in this section, the findings of the study are correlated with each of the three research questions presented in chapter one after a brief review of the questions and the researcher's predictions as far as possible outcomes, results are.